Dodgers quietly add former No. 2 prospect on a low-risk deal, and the upside is hard to ignore. lt

To call the Los Angeles Dodgers spoiled in the pitching department would be a major understatement.

This was a Dodgers team that could afford to put righties Emmet Sheehan and Roki Sasaki in the bullpen down the stretch, because the starting rotation was so stacked. And the depth chart extends much farther, as young pitchers like Bobby Miller, River Ryan, Gavin Stone, Justin Wrobleski, and Landon Knaack have all flirted with rotation spots in recent seasons.

With all that depth to speak of, it was still something of a surprise to see Nick Frasso, who MLB Pipeline ranked as the No. 2 prospect in the organization less than two years ago, get non-tendered in November. But it appears Frasso’s absence from the depth chart will be a short one.

GLENDALE, ARIZONA – FEBRUARY 11: Nick Frasso #79 of the Los Angeles Dodgers throws during workouts at Camelback Ranch on February 11, 2025 in Glendale…

On Saturday, Aram Leighton of Just Baseball reported that Frasso was re-signing with the Dodgers on a minor-league deal. The 27-year-old will have a hill to climb, but he still has a chance now to make his major league debut with the organization that has developed him for the past 3 1/2 years.

Frasso was fairly dominant for the Dodgers’ Double-A and Triple-A teams in 2023 before he tore his labrum late in the season and underwent a surgery that cost him all of last year. He was ready to pitch by opening day of this season, and made 43 appearances, 36 of which came out of the bullpen, for Triple-A Oklahoma City.

After he compiled a 5.49 ERA and 1.58 WHIP this year, it was understandable that the Dodgers didn’t want to keep using a 40-man roster spot on Frasso, and the fact that he wasn’t signed by another organization in the three-plus weeks of his free agency could be interpreted a number of ways.

Did Frasso simply not find any better opportunities than the one the Dodgers were offering him to come to spring training and compete? Or did he have good reason to be there, with the organization telling him he had a decent shot to win a bullpen role at some point during the season?

Related Posts

The Blue Jays’ Latest $37 Million Move Comes With an Immediate and Unexpected Release.pd

Blue Jays Release Player After $37 Million News The news didn’t arrive gently. It landed with a dull thud — the kind that makes fans pause mid-scroll and reread the…

Read more

Kyle Tucker buzz shifts after a key update puts Dodgers back in focus amid Blue Jays link. lt

Getty The Los Angeles Dodgers and Toronto Blue Jays are among the teams linked to free-agent hitter Kyle Tucker, who has yet to decide on his future after spending the 2025 MLB season with the Chicago…

Read more

Blue Jays get a quiet boost in their push to keep Bo Bichette after pivotal Braves news. lt

Chicago Cubs v Toronto Blue Jays | Cole Burston/GettyImages If the Toronto Blue Jays fail to sign Kyle Tucker this winter, it will not be for a lack of trying. Tucker visited…

Read more

⚡ LATEST UPDATE: Zia Cooke is gearing up for a 2026 return to AU Pro Basketball, adding fresh intrigue to the league ⚡.mt

She showcased consistent offensive production throughout her AU debut season and continued to grow her profile as a dynamic young guard. Cooke was selected tenth overall in the 2023 WNBA…

Read more

💥 BREAKING NEWS: A beloved Astros fan favorite is increasingly viewed as a likely future trade candidate, according to growing league buzz ⚡.ht

Troy Taormina-Imagn Images It happened with Kyle Tucker. It happened with Alex Bregman. It happened with Gerrit Cole. It will happen to Jeremy Pena. Since Jim Crane bought the Astros…

Read more

Blue Jays get a quiet boost in their push to keep Bo Bichette after pivotal Braves news. lt

he Toronto Blue Jays are very much hoping they will be able to retain free agent Bo Bichette, who is one of the best infielders available across MLB, and is expected to land…

Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *